On Further Reflection

| No Comments | View blog reactions

Let's look at it another way. Yes, we saw Tony Blair defeated for the first time. But they've managed to push through a doubling of the time that a suspect can be held without charge. That's still pretty disgusting. Are there any "democratic" countries with a longer period?

If I was feeling paranoid, I might imagine a conversation taking place along these lines a few months ago...

Ian Blair: We think we might want to increase the amount of time we can hold them without charging them.

Tony Blair: What do you want it to be?

Ian Blair: 28 days.

Tony Blair: 28 days! Bloody hell, that's doubling it. The civil liberties crowd will never go for that.

Ian Blair: So we can't have it?

Tony Blair: I didn't say that. But we'd need to be a bit sneaky. What if we said we were trying to increase it to a completely unreasonable length of time that no sane person would support - and then presented 28 days as a compromise.

Ian Blair: How long would you ask for first.

Tony Blair: Well it would need to be completely over the top, maybe 90 days.

Ian Blair: 90 days! That's ridiculous. No-one would ever go for that.

Tony Blair: Precisely.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Dave Cross published on November 10, 2005 8:03 AM.

A Good Day was the previous entry in this blog.

"Traitors" is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Archives

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en