Comments on: Conservapedia on Dawkins http://blog.dave.org.uk/2007/10/conservapedia-o.html In which someone you've never heard of writes about things you have no interest in Sun, 05 May 2013 20:34:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Aristotle Pagaltzis http://blog.dave.org.uk/2007/10/conservapedia-o.html#comment-2387 Aristotle Pagaltzis Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:21:46 +0000 http://newblog.dave.org.uk/?p=1350#comment-2387 Argh, that excerpt is a crying pain to read. It should be posted to the “blog” of “unnecessary” quotation marks.

]]> By: Dave Cross http://blog.dave.org.uk/2007/10/conservapedia-o.html#comment-2386 Dave Cross Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:40:32 +0000 http://newblog.dave.org.uk/?p=1350#comment-2386

I think all “links” to this site should be text only from now on. Actually linking is essentially helping to promote it from a search engine point of view, and I’d hate to see this site turn up in the top 10 SERPS for any searches on Dawkins.

You’ll notice, I hope, that the link to the Conservapedia article is on the words “verged on libel” rather than the words “Richard Dawkins” :-)

]]> By: mou http://blog.dave.org.uk/2007/10/conservapedia-o.html#comment-2385 mou Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:16:26 +0000 http://newblog.dave.org.uk/?p=1350#comment-2385 Maybe its because I’m reading through the eyes of a man who’s sceptical (at best) about the existence of God, but reading the discussion is… well, its like watching a car crash. Its shocking that people can be so insistent in their arguements, then offer precisely zero proof to back ANY of it up. Part of me is hoping that Dawkins threatens a libel suit on the owner of the website before anyone reads the article as actually takes any of it in.Favourite quote of the discussion:”That is a primary tactic of atheists – denial of reality to suit their own convictions”Arghhhhh, its so frustrating – like watching 2 gutter rats argue on Jerry Springer. They believe in an invisible, untouchable, unprovable entity that lives in the sky, and accuse people who ridicule the idea as denying reality! Could someone check the definition of “Hypocrisy” in the dictionary for me??I think all “links” to this site should be text only from now on. Actually linking is essentially helping to promote it from a search engine point of view, and I’d hate to see this site turn up in the top 10 SERPS for any searches on Dawkins. People that demand their views are respected then launch a personal attack on people whos views differ do not deserve to have their opinions heard.

]]>